US Citizens Detained and Deported
The Deportation Research Clinic has assisted many U.S. citizens unlawfully detained or deported by the U.S. government and worked to bring their cases to the attention of the public.
For background, see "U.S. Government Unlawfully Detaining and Deporting U.S. Citizens," Virginia J. of Social Policy and the Law (2011), 115 pp. See also essay on parallels between abolitionism in the 1850's and deportation abolitionism: "Habeas Corpus and the New Abolitionism," University of Georgia Press (2018), 110-123 pp.
Research Updates
- Analysis of U.S. citizens in immigration court, and applying for Certificates of Citizenship, January 1, 2011 through June 9, 2017. Posted July 31, 2017.
- Citizenship in Question: Evidentiary Birthright and Statelessness (Duke University Press, 2017), co-edited with Benjamin Lawrance.
- April 14, 2016: Deportation Research Clinic prevails in Rule 60 motion for FOIA litigation attorney fees—retired judge had denied fees without hearing, plea for reconsideration with assent of U.S. Attorney granted. (Director obtains email from State Department officials who encounter deported U.S. citizen Mark Little in Honduras and Guatemala.)
- June 1, 2015: Analysis of U.S. Citizens ICE Unlawfully Detained or Banished Since January 1, 2011
- New release of immigration court data reveals ICE still systematically detaining U.S. citizens
- U.S. citizen Andres Robles, deported to Mexico, returns, wins record $350,000 settlement and government agreement to expunge records
- Clinic FOIA attorney Andrew Free represents Robles; case first reported by Clinic Director Jacqueline Stevens.
- Clinic research assistants Ary Hansen and Elizabeth Meehan analyze immigration judge misconduct data. Agency supervisors ignore serious complaints if not from government. Responses take hundreds of days, and recommend "oral counseling" or no response. Professor Heather Schoenfeld, School for Education and Social Policy and Legal Studies to co-author research article with J. Stevens.
- "Citizenship In Question: Forensic Challenges of Birth, Blood, and Bureaucracy," co-edited with Benjamin Lawrance, based on conference convened by co-editors at Boston College Law School and co-sponsored and organized with Dan Kanstroom, Rachel Rosenbloom, and Rogers Smith. Contributors narrate failures of signification for passports, certificates, and databases from Australia to Togo. Introduction draws on Jacques Derrida to suggest failures of a-scription and to reveal narrative strategies that empower arbitrary authorities at the expense of the people populating the identities government creates.
- Remembered Intimacies and the Bona Fide Marriage, funded by the Sexualities Project at Northwestern, IRB-approved study, Charles Clarke, co-principal investigator. Study compares rate and character of non-matching answers on spousal green card interviews with rate and character of non-matching answers on "The Newlywed Game" television show. (Premise of government interview is that non-matching answers about shared experiences reveals marriage fraud; premise of "Newlywed Game" is that bona fide couples will have non-matching answers.)